TABLE 2. Comparison of number of roots against height, length, and width. Some specimens are fragmentary, and the number of roots could not be determined for them. This distribution of roots differs slightly from, and supersedes, previous reports on these localities (Martin 1979; Ruez 2001).

		Inglis 1A					Inglis 1C
	Roots	N	length	width	height		N	length	width	height
	2	1 (4%)	2.19	1.51	1.03		1 (3%)	2.39	1.68	0.84
	3	22 (79%)	2.30	1.62	0.93		21 (68%)	2.31	1.60	0.83
	4	5 (18%)	2.34	1.62	0.91		9 (29%)	2.32	1.59	0.83